Re: Merging staging?

[Efraim Flashner]

On January 9, 2019 7:15:56 PM UTC, Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> wrote:
>Hi Efraim,
>
>Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I merged master into staging today and got the following chart:
>>
>> | architecture | berlin | hydra |
>> +--------------+--------+-------+
>> | x86_64       | 42.2%  | 78.8% |
>> | i686         | 28.2%  | 64.3% |
>> | aarch64      | 0%     | 23.0% |
>> | armhf        | 16.8%  | 50.4% |
>>
>> but compared to master:
>>
>> | architecture | berlin | hydra |
>> +--------------+--------+-------+
>> | x86_64       | 57.5%  | 91.9% |
>> | i686         | 44.4%  | 77.8% |
>> | aarch64      | 0%     | 41.8% |
>> | armhf        | 30.3%  | 69.6% |
>
>Something looks wrong here, because Hydra has never supported aarch64,
>i.e. it does not create jobs for that system and has never been
>connected to an aarch64 build slave, so I don't see how it could
>possibly have more than 0% coverage on that system.
>
>> So I think I'd like to see a comparison on hydra of staging vs master
>> and if it's good enough we go ahead and merge
>
>I just asked Hydra to produce another evaluation of 'staging'.  When it
>has finished doing so, we'll know more.
>
>      Thanks!
>        Mark

And I thought I triple checked I had them in the right columns!

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.