guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#25713: Mixed collecton of vim-plugins


From: ng0
Subject: bug#25713: Mixed collecton of vim-plugins
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:07:48 +0000

On 17-02-28 12:27:01, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> ng0 <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a collection of Vim plugins ready:
> >
> >       gnu: Add vim-neocomplete.
> >       gnu: Add vim-scheme.
> >       gnu: Add vim-neosnippet-snippets.
> >       gnu: Add vim-neosnippet.
> >       gnu: Add vim-luna.
> >       gnu: Add vim-context-filetype.
> >       gnu: Add vim-airline.
> >       gnu: Add vim-airline-themes.
> >       gnu: Add vim-orgmode.
> >       gnu: Add vim-markdown.
> >
> > Only two of them need some fixes, but this should be doable tomorrow.
> > Before I send them in tomorrow, I'd like to take the time to ask a question
> > on a detail which is not obvious in the patches.
> >
> > I use them all by setting this in my .vimrc:
> >
> > " plugins handled by Guix:
> > set rtp+=~/.guix-profile/share/vim/vimfiles/
> >
> > This is basically what Vundle does too, and it works for me.
> >
> > How is this best communicated to people installing these packages?
> > This isn't an environment variable, so maybe simply put it in the
> > documentation maybe?
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Unrelated: The exception from the default seems to be that you have a
> > Makefile. The default case is that you simply copy every folder to the
> > path.
> > In the future I can see my usage of the gnu build-system I used lead to
> > vim-build-system which simplifies this process when I understand more of
> > the Vim packages.
> >
> > I used the patches list with the intention to just send the series to
> > this email - Combined patches and discussion.
> 
> All pushed to master (and vim-luna was cleaned up as you wished).

Thanks! patch-bug closed hereby.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]