guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#28425] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: sqlite: Update to 3.20.1.


From: Catonano
Subject: [bug#28425] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: sqlite: Update to 3.20.1.
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 23:00:22 +0200

2017-09-12 15:24 GMT+02:00 Jelle Licht <address@hidden>:

Catonano <address@hidden> writes:

> 2017-09-12 0:17 GMT+02:00 Jelle Licht <address@hidden>:
>
>> * gnu/packages/databases.scm (sqlite): Update to 3.20.1.
>> ---
>>  gnu/packages/databases.scm | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/databases.scm b/gnu/packages/databases.scm
>> index ba365523d..37890a91f 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/databases.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/databases.scm
>> @@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ for example from a shell script.")
>>  (define-public sqlite
>>    (package
>>     (name "sqlite")
>> -   (version "3.19.3")
>> +   (version "3.20.1")
>>     (source (origin
>>              (method url-fetch)
>>              (uri (let ((numeric-version
>> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ for example from a shell script.")
>>                                    numeric-version ".tar.gz")))
>>              (sha256
>>               (base32
>> -              "00b3l2qglpl1inx21fckiwxnfq5xf6441flc79rqg7zdvh1rq4h6"))))
>> +              "0hh7jnxfwvs2qlvmjwrgkvxb8sk4x8hj04m54fq9h1xw55dmjrpc"))))
>>     (build-system gnu-build-system)
>>     (inputs `(("readline" ,readline)))
>>     (arguments
>> --
>> 2.14.1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> It just built successfully.
>
> Are there any more checsks/tests I should perform in order to properly
> review this ?

If you have the time, you could try building and using something which
depends on sqlite. I have verified python-apsw (my other patch) to work
properly already, but there are lots of dependents of sqlite which might
inadvertently break because of my patch.

Jelle, I tried but core-updates is too much !

It was bootstrapping Guile 2.2.2 when I stopped it. And that can be a long process, if I remember correctly

When I first reported to have built it successfully, I had branched from master and git am'ed your patch there. So many things were available already

This second time I tried with the real core-updates branch

I'm afraid you'll need to set up your own Cuirass instance :-/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]