[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32508: [PATCH] gnu: libx11: Replace with 1.6.6 [security fixes].
|
From: |
Marius Bakke |
|
Subject: |
bug#32508: [PATCH] gnu: libx11: Replace with 1.6.6 [security fixes]. |
|
Date: |
Sat, 25 Aug 2018 16:35:38 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.27 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
>> +;; Replacement package to fix multiple security bugs:
>> +;; <http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q3/146>.
>> +(define-public libx11-1.6.6
>> + (package/inherit libx11
>
> Does it need to use package/inherit? My understanding is that procedure
> is primarily useful for packages that inherit from another package foo,
> when foo is being grafted. For example, the current situation with
> cups-minimal and cups.
Ah yes; you're right: in this case we don't need package/inherit because
we are not inheriting an existing graft. I always mix those up, thanks
for catching it!
Pushed as 94e9d750a22e30459732d2ae14d71c5f3acabd91.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature