Re: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/storm article.rst

[hemppah]

Lainaus Benja Fallenstein <address@hidden>:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> Hermanni Hyytiälä wrote:
> >     p2p overview: peernet
> 
> I don't think this is relevant... too far down the stack. Storm never 
> knows about this level, nor is it interested in it...

I wrote something *interesting* about current research with regard to p2p, as 
we agreed in #gzz, in overview section. I think this a worth to mention, since 
PeerNet differs from 'p2p mainstream' in 'layer'(application level <--> network 
layer), but otherwise have very similar features as other application level p2p 
systems (DHT-like routing, log n neighbors, log n routing, local knowledge etc).

I think Toni wrote something about 'Storm's knowledge' already ?


-Hermani 



-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/