[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex
From: |
Janne V. Kujala |
Subject: |
[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 10:32:25 -0500 |
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/gzz
Module name: manuscripts
Changes by: Janne V. Kujala <address@hidden> 03/03/20 10:32:25
Modified files:
Paper : paper.tex
Log message:
cleanup
CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex.diff?tr1=1.41&tr2=1.42&r1=text&r2=text
Patches:
Index: manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex
diff -u manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.41 manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.42
--- manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.41 Thu Mar 20 09:16:54 2003
+++ manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex Thu Mar 20 10:32:25 2003
@@ -445,11 +445,6 @@
%XXX: shorten by one half column
-XXX: - visual discrimination experiments: \cite{julesz62visualpattern}
-
-XXX: simple models (filtering) can have good explanatory power
-on texture discrimination\cite{bergen88earlyvision}.
-
In this section, we discuss the methods to generate unique
background textures on an abstract level.
@@ -1125,11 +1120,7 @@
we start from a fairly light background (>80 XXX).
On a darker background, this approach would probably look silly.
-\subsection{Recognizability and memorizability}
-
-% XXX: shorten by half
-
-JVK
+\subsection{Texture perception}
Psychophysical studies on texture perception have mostly concentrated
on \emph{visual texture discrimination}\cite{julesz62visualpattern},
@@ -1172,7 +1163,26 @@
In our application visual texture discrimination is not as
much of an issue as memorizability and recognizability of
-previously seen textures.
+previously seen textures, because the textures are ... discriminable..
+
+
+There have been studies on
+mapping texture appearance to an Euclidian texture space
+(see \cite{gurnsey01texturespace} and the references therein):
+in the reported experiments, three dimensions have been sufficient
+to explain most of the variation in the similarity judgements for
+artificial textures.
+However, the texture stimuli have been somewhat simple
+(no color, lack of frequency-band interaction, etc.).
+For some natural texture sets (see, e.g., \cite{rao96texturenaming}),
+three dimensions have also been
+sufficient, but often semantic connections cause the
+similarity to be context-dependant, making it hard to assess the
+dimensionality.
+% XXX: this is something we should experiment with our textures
+
+\subsection{Recognizability and memorizability}
+
The textures created by our algorithm,
although repeating, are more like complete images
than the statistical microstructure studied in most texture perception work.
@@ -1213,29 +1223,14 @@
have shown that file popularity approximately follows Zipf's law
(see, e.g. [xxxref]) so that a small number of documents accounts
for most of the use.
-Furthermore, because the texture appearance has no semantic connection
-with the document,
+
+Furthermore, because the texture appearance has no correlation
+with the document content,
the textures of any two important files are similar only by chance.
%Our experience shows that at least the most recurring textures
%are not only recognized but can
%also easily be associated with the document content.
-
-XXX
-
-Mapping texture appearance to an Euclidian texture space
-(see \cite{gurnsey01texturespace} and the references therein):
-in the reported experiments, three dimensions have been sufficient
-to explain most of the variation in the similarity judgements for
-artificial textures.
-However, the texture stimuli have been somewhat simple
-(no color, lack of frequency-band interaction, etc.).
-For some natural texture sets (see, e.g., \cite{rao96texturenaming}),
-three dimensions have also been
-sufficient, but often semantic connections cause the
-similarity to be context-dependant, making it hard to assess the
-dimensionality.
-% XXX: this is something we should experiment with our textures
XXX: refs?
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, (continued)
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/17
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/17
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/18
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/18
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/20
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/20
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/20
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/03/20
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/03/20
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/03/20
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex,
Janne V. Kujala <=
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/20
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/20
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/20
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/03/21
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/21
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/23
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/23
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/28
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/28
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/03/29