gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Sigs article.rst


From: Tuomas J. Lukka
Subject: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Sigs article.rst
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 12:23:47 -0400

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        03/05/19 12:23:47

Modified files:
        Sigs           : article.rst 

Log message:
        state

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/Sigs/article.rst.diff?tr1=1.113&tr2=1.114&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/Sigs/article.rst
diff -u manuscripts/Sigs/article.rst:1.113 manuscripts/Sigs/article.rst:1.114
--- manuscripts/Sigs/article.rst:1.113  Mon May 19 12:21:54 2003
+++ manuscripts/Sigs/article.rst        Mon May 19 12:23:47 2003
@@ -191,12 +191,8 @@
 Obtaining the minimal integral solutions of this inequality 
 gives us a tradeoff where the length of the signature is approximately
 linear with `$N$` and the time to sign grows exponentially with `$n$`.
+Table [ref-tabtradeoff]_ shows 
 
-All choices produce a *linear* operation from the characteristics
-of a scheme to the characteristics of the other scheme.
-Particularly, the signature length increases linearly with `$N$`,
-and the time to sign grows exponentially with `$n$` and
-linearly (in the opposite direction!) with `$N$`.
 
 ..  raw:: latex
 
@@ -210,7 +206,8 @@
     \input kbmhtrade
     \hline
     \end{tabular}
-    \caption{The tradeoff between rounds of key boosting
+    \caption{\label{tabtradeoff}
+    The tradeoff between rounds of key boosting
     and branching factor when using key boosting 
     and Merkle hash trees to 
     obtain the full digital signature feature set 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]