[Heartlogic-dev] Re: feedback on site 2004-01-01

[Joshua N Pritikin]

On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 10:32:45AM -0600, William L. Jarrold wrote:
> I just visited the page and there was no difference.  Bold sounds fine.
> You might try a different font size?

It _is_ changed.  Try "reload" on your browser.

> > > (3) It would be cool to have a hotlink from OHL to the aleader dev
> > >     site complete with all the email discussion, no?
> >
> > Added, near "Experimental Roadmap".
> 
> Thanks.  But what be much better would be to hotlink directly
> to the email discussions.  E.g. to...
> 
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/heartlogic-dev/
> 
> ...and to maybe also have a hotlink to the savanah project page.  The
> way it is now, I think that most people would look at the savanah page and
> move on.

Done.

> > Also, I really like the paragraph I quoted.
> 
> Hmm, okay but it doesn't really excite me.  But, I'll try to flexible
> with my tastes.
> 
> Hey, here's a question: what if we have a serious deep disagreement
> on some issue.  It would be good to have an agreed upon procedure
> in place on what to do if you think we should do A and I think we
> should B and A and B contradict each other.

At worst, the project will split into OHL-Joshua and OHL-Bill and
we'll have two competing web sites.  Hopefully this won't happen.

I tentatively think that we have already voiced all our serious
beliefs and found no fundemental disagreement.

> > I added "We believe" at the beginning of the paragraph.  Is this
> > sufficient?
> 
> Well, err, not really.  I don't believe it strongly enough to put it
> up on a public web page.  For example, your construct of the spectrum
> of logical to emotional personalities, has that really been validated?
> Not to my knowledge. It is intuitively somewhat compeling, granted.  What
> if you somehow bracketed this.  E.g. on a separate page you could say
> "Joshua believes..."...An area where you could do whatever you want
> would have other advantages too, e.g. I have a generaly sense that the
> personal growth stuff is seeping back in.  I'm not sure why, but I just
> feel leery about getting into that.  On the part of the OHL website that
> we share, I want to stay focused on cognitive models.

OK, not a big deal.  I'll just remove that stuff and finish the
section with a short list of clinical conditions.

> But, I do think this idea of logical vs emotional personality/thinking
> styles is an interesting idea.  It deserves space.  Thus, I'm leaning
> towards a separate web page for it.

I'll just delete it for now.  It is in CVS.  We can always
resurrect it later.

> > >   (c) cognitive reframing....Thanks so much for putting that up
> > >   there...How about this, can you add a little more explanation
> > >   of cognitive reframing...How about this:
> >
> > I added most of this, but not verbatim.  Take a look and tell me
> > if you like what I did with it.
> 
> Looks good enough for now.
> 
> Oh....Minor point, could you change...
> 
> "The model being developed for OHL includes goal substitution, which is a
> type of cognitive reframing."
> 
> ...to...
> 
> "The model being developed for OHL includes goal substitution, which can
> be viewed as a type of cognitive reframing."

Done.

-- 
A new cognitive theory of emotion, http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/aleader