heartlogic-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Heartlogic-dev] Re: fine tuning


From: William L. Jarrold
Subject: [Heartlogic-dev] Re: fine tuning
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:06:00 -0600 (CST)

Wow.  Thanks.

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:17:04AM -0600, William L. Jarrold wrote:
> > A quick random thought...Hrm, I intuitively think 8 clicks might
> > be too many.
> >
> > One thing I think we should get rid of for the initial stages is asking
> > them for diagnosis.  1) it might scare people 2) it wasn't part of the
> > original dissertation study so, why should it be now?...But, yes, longer
> > term we will definitely want this info, or info like it....E.g. we might
> > want their scale on the Gilliam Autism Scale, but this is an issue for
> > much later.  But my suspicion is that we will have a devil of a time
> > getting the, shoot, I think it is 90 subjects minimum we need. (10 per
> > group, 9 groups, i think).
>
> I am quick to agree.
>
> Fixed.
>
> New experts are no longer presented with the diagnostic page.
>
> --
> A new cognitive theory of emotion, http://openheartlogic.org
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]