Re: [FC-general] Re: How to change default outcome of shift/reduce conflict?

[Hans Aberg]

At 13:08 +0100 2002/01/15, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
>  You know that if someone were in that mood it could be
>misinterpreted to be an insult ... Next time you might want to put a
>smiley behind that, or a "<g>".

Have you ever thought of that telling others what to do the way you do
could be interpreted as an insult?

>>Specifically, in the rule
>>   x -> ANSWER expr WITH expr OR expr
>>is "OR" allowed in the "expr" of the "ANSWER expr WITH" part?
>>
>>And, how do you want
>>   ANSWER expr WITH expr OR expr OR expr OR expr
>>to be interpreted? Possibilities:
>>   ANSWER expr WITH (expr OR expr) OR (expr OR expr)
>>   (ANSWER expr WITH expr OR expr) OR expr OR expr
>>   ANSWER expr WITH expr OR (expr OR expr OR expr)
>>   ...
>>Or does it not matter, because the semantics is the same?
...
>  That can be determined pretty easily by running it through HyperCard.

So why don't you do that then, letting us to know the result, I mean if the
idea is that help on the topic should come forth?

  Hans Aberg