[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: redundant merges for GLR
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: redundant merges for GLR |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:49:50 -0400 (EDT) |
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Paul Eggert wrote:
> bug-bison would have been better
I'll do that next time.
> I'm a bit worried about the storage management for the deleted nodes
> (did you look into that?)
Yes. I believe all SemanticOption's are pulled from nextFree of a
GLRStack. That is, they come from the items array. Thus, they should be
freed with the GLRStack even if they're removed from the SemanticOption's
next list.
> I installed this patch, which doesn't quite match yours exactly but
> which uses the same idea.
Seems the same modulo some variable cleanup.
Joel