[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
symlink does not work on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE
From: |
Rune Mossige |
Subject: |
symlink does not work on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:29:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
I am trying to get a simple cfagent.conf file to run on a FreeBSD
4.4-STABLE host, using v2.0a15.
The cfagent.conf have only one actionsequence, link, and the error
message I see is:
Actionsequenc item links
GetLock(link,_omlogs__prod_omlogs,time=1007723817), ExpireAfter=15,
IfElapsed=15
GetLastLock()
PutLock(last._var_cfengine_inputs_cfagent_conf.100.GSTES9.stavanger.Geco-Prakla.sl.link._omlogs__prod_omlogs)
Unable to delete lock
[last._var_cfengine_inputs_cfagent_conf.100.GSTES9.stavanger.Geco-Prakla.sl.link._omlogs__prod_omlogs]:
DB_NOTFOU
ND: No matching key/data pair found
CheckOldLock(lock._var_cfengine_inputs_cfagent_conf.GSTES9.stavanger.Geco-Prakla.sl.link._omlogs__prod_omlogs)
Unable to find lock data
lock._var_cfengine_inputs_cfagent_conf.GSTES9.stavanger.Geco-Prakla.sl.link._omlogs__prod_omlogs
SetLock(lock._var_cfengine_inputs_cfagent_conf.GSTES9.stavanger.Geco-Prakla.sl.link._omlogs__prod_omlogs)
PutLock(lock._var_cfengine_inputs_cfagent_conf.GSTES9.stavanger.Geco-Prakla.sl.link._omlogs__prod_omlogs)
Unable to delete lock
[lock._var_cfengine_inputs_cfagent_conf.GSTES9.stavanger.Geco-Prakla.sl.link._omlogs__prod_omlogs]:
DB_NOTFOUND:
No matching key/data pair found
ExpandVarbinserv /prod/omlogs, (Binserver is GSTES9)
Linkfiles(/omlogs,/prod/omlogs)
IgnoredOrExcluded(omlogs)
cfengine:GSTES9.stavanger.Geco-Prakla.sl: Error while trying to link
/omlogs -> /prod/omlogs
ReleaseCurrentLock(lock._var_cfengine_inputs_cfagent_conf.GSTES9.stavanger.Geco-Prakla.sl.link._omlogs__prod_omlogs)
PutLock(last._var_cfengine_inputs_cfagent_conf.100.GSTES9.stavanger.Geco-Prakla.sl.link._omlogs__prod_omlogs)
LockLog(Lock removed normally )
Job start time set to Fri Dec 7 12:16:57 2001
The exact same cfagent.conf file works just fine on a RedHat 7.2 Linux
host, so I believe the config file is OK. Anyone else seen this, and
have a tip on how to get around that?
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(-: Hiroshima 45, Chernobyl 86, Windows 95 :-)
Our ultimate goal is to make overloaded systems appear to be idle.
High performance, High reliability, Low cost -------- Pick any two.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Rune Mossige, Systems Support Engineer, WesternGeco, Stavanger
Tel: (+47)51946869 Mobile:(+47)90871024
- symlink does not work on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE,
Rune Mossige <=