[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dealing with multiple domains
From: |
Chris Edillon |
Subject: |
Re: dealing with multiple domains |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 23:29:55 -0400 (GMT+4) |
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Chris Edillon wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Nate Campi wrote:
>
> > It's not robust to use resolv.conf in this way at all. I don't use
> > "domain" directives in that file on any of my hosts, since the "search"
> > directive conflicts the "domain" directive (and I use the "search"
> > directive).
> >
> i've found in practice that they can coexist in resolv.conf,
> and that the search directive overrides the domain directive.
> because of this, one could concievably have both and use the
> domain directive for nothing other than information purposes,
> such as for a cfengine script. :)
>
> > <URL:http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bind-users&m=104380458118448&w=2>
>
i stand corrected after actually reading the above. cricket
liu is certainly someone with more knowledge of BIND than i.
chris
- dealing with multiple domains, Luke A. Kanies, 2003/02/10
- Re: dealing with multiple domains, Mark . Burgess, 2003/02/10
- Re: dealing with multiple domains, Chris Edillon, 2003/02/10
- Re: dealing with multiple domains, Nate Campi, 2003/02/10
- Re: dealing with multiple domains, Chris Edillon, 2003/02/10
- Re: dealing with multiple domains,
Chris Edillon <=
- Re: dealing with multiple domains, Mark . Burgess, 2003/02/10
- Re: dealing with multiple domains, Luke A. Kanies, 2003/02/11
- Re: dealing with multiple domains, Marion Hakanson, 2003/02/11
- Re: dealing with multiple domains, Chris Edillon, 2003/02/11
- Re: dealing with multiple domains, Mark . Burgess, 2003/02/10
- Re: dealing with multiple domains, Andrew Stribblehill, 2003/02/11