[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strategy for "one-off" tasks
From: |
Mark . Burgess |
Subject: |
Re: Strategy for "one-off" tasks |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:22:39 +0200 (MEST) |
> One problem with a define, possibly serious depending upon the command
> to be run, is that if the cfagent is killed between the time a file is
> edited and the shell command is run the action will be lost. The
> chance that this may happen may be slim but it is possible. It would
> be useful if there were a class of of persistent defines that could be
> stored in the filesystem then removed later, for example at the
> completion of a shellcommand.
>
This is coming in 2.1.0, if ...only ...I ..had ......time.....
M
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work: +47 22453272 Email: Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no
Fax : +47 22453205 WWW : http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- RE: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, (continued)
- RE: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, Nielsen, Steve, 2003/07/10
- Re: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, Spam Collector, 2003/07/10
- Re: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, Frank Smith, 2003/07/10
- Re: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, Daniel Pittman, 2003/07/10
- Re: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, Adrian Phillips, 2003/07/11
- Re: Strategy for "one-off" tasks,
Mark . Burgess <=
- Re: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, Jamie Wilkinson, 2003/07/11
- Re: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, Allen Bettilyon, 2003/07/11
- Re: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, David Douthitt, 2003/07/14
- Re: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, Jamie Wilkinson, 2003/07/14
RE: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, Ferguson, Steve, 2003/07/11
Re: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, David Masterson, 2003/07/11
RE: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, Ferguson, Steve, 2003/07/11
RE: Strategy for "one-off" tasks, Ferguson, Steve, 2003/07/14