[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
cfrun: question about the output for unreachable hosts
From: |
Moritz Bunkus |
Subject: |
cfrun: question about the output for unreachable hosts |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.2 |
Hey,
I've got cfengine 2.1.10 running on a couple of Debian machines
here. Not all are running 24/7 (the workstations). The usual thing.
Everything is fine. I'm just a bit confused about cfrun's output if a
host is unrechable. Example:
0 root@ls-bs-si2:/home/mbunkus$ cfrun ls-bs-ws3
cfrun(0): .......... [ Hailing
ls-bs-ws3.bs.linet-services.de ] ..........
cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de: Couldn't open a socket
cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de: socket: No route to host
ls-bs-ws3 is indeed down, but why does cfrun use ls-bs-si2... as the
host name in this case? This gets even more confusing when I run cfrun
without any argument and it iterates through all hosts in
cfrun.hosts. For each unreachable host it just prints the two lines
shown above, and I have no clue whatsoever which hosts are actually
down.
So. Is this the intended behaviour? If yes, then why (probably because I
don't fully understand how cfengine works; but that information above is
useless and misleading)? If not, has this bug been fixed already? The
ChangeLog for 2.1.13 does not mention anything in that direction, and I
don't really want to install from source only for trying, and the
packages in Debian/testing are at 2.1.10.
Thanks for your help.
Moritz
--
LINET Services GbR
Gotenweg 15 Tel.: 0531-280 191 71
38106 Braunschweig Fax.: 0531-280 191 72
http://www.linet-services.de
info@linet-services.de
pgpBkaNPHfKn7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- cfrun: question about the output for unreachable hosts,
Moritz Bunkus <=
Re: cfrun: question about the output for unreachable hosts, David Douthitt, 2005/02/25