[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?
From: |
Mark Burgess |
Subject: |
Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation? |
Date: |
Thu, 12 May 2005 21:14:26 +0200 |
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 14:06 -0500, Brendan Strejcek wrote:
> Roy MARANTZ wrote:
>
> > If the action list is eliminated, IMHO, there needs to be some
> > mechanism to specify the ordering of actions. i.e. I need to
> > run shellcommands (and others) twice in order to make sure that
> > perconditions for certain actions are met. To be concrete, I need to
> > blow up a tar ball before I can override some file in it.
>
> Wouldn't it be cool if you could just do:
>
> shellcommands:
> did_some_command::
> "/command/that/must/come/after some/command"
> any::
> "/some/command"
> define=did_some_command
>
> and have cfagent figure out the rest? There is no complexity or
> ambiguity for the admin to sort out, and no imperative illusion.
You already can do this, if you observe AddInstallable.
M
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, (continued)
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Brendan Strejcek, 2005/05/10
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Tim Nelson, 2005/05/11
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Jamie Wilkinson, 2005/05/12
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Mark Burgess, 2005/05/12
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Ed Brown, 2005/05/12
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Brendan Strejcek, 2005/05/12
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Ed Brown, 2005/05/12
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Brendan Strejcek, 2005/05/12
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Brendan Strejcek, 2005/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Brendan Strejcek, 2005/05/12
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?,
Mark Burgess <=
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Brendan Strejcek, 2005/05/12
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Mark Burgess, 2005/05/12
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Ed Brown, 2005/05/12
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Mark Burgess, 2005/05/13
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Brendan Strejcek, 2005/05/13
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Mark Burgess, 2005/05/13
- Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Tim Nelson, 2005/05/12
Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Brendan Strejcek, 2005/05/10
Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Adams, Russell L., 2005/05/10
Re: Is this quirky for a simple copy, editfiles operation?, Brendan Strejcek, 2005/05/10