[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bug#7333: [PATCH] {maint} Fix a bug in variable concatanation with `

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: bug#7333: [PATCH] {maint} Fix a bug in variable concatanation with `+='.
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 20:11:19 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04)

Hello help-debbugs!

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 12:05:30PM CET:
> On Tuesday 09 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:35:26PM CET:
> > > > The commands above (Bcc:ed to control at debbugs) should merge and
> > > > close both bugs.
> > > Thanks for doing that.  But I think it would have been better to merge
> > > #7345 in #7333.
> > 
> > Huh?  That is exactly what I did.
> Then why it is "#7345" and not "#7333" which appeared in the list of
> "Outstanding bugs" (and appears ow in the list of "Resolved bugs")?
> Or is it debbugs which, when two bug reports are merged, automatically
> keeps the most recent one of them visible?

On it is documented that with
  forcemerge N1 N2

N1 will become the master bug.  Apparently that is not the same with
  merge N1 N2

No; wait.

When I look at
then it shows 7333 not 7345.
When I look at;max-bugs=100;base-order=1;bug-rev=1
then it shows 7345 not 7333.  The latter is linked from the main debbugs
page, the former is redirected from

It seems the bug-rev=1 is the cause here.  This looks like a debbugs bug
to me.  Where should I report it?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]