[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: POSIX-isms (was Re: Latest Flex 2.6 code & doc)
From: |
john43 |
Subject: |
Re: POSIX-isms (was Re: Latest Flex 2.6 code & doc) |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Jul 2003 13:07:41 -0400 |
>> Just to clarify, flex itself uses POSIX IPC
mechanisms,
>> but the _generated_ code does not.
>
>That will not help a lot. Flex-generated output is
typically not included
>in source distributions anyway. Which means that for
most users on
>POSIX-impaired systems, being unable to run flex will
mean they can't
>build those packages, either.
Not true. Flex-generated sources are almost always
included in source distributions.
>If at all possible, it would be preferrable to at
least restrict IPC usage
>to popen() and friends. Those are routinely
emulatable by synchronous
>instead of asynchronous subprocesses, even on
single-tasking OSes like
>MS-DOS, and there are implementations provided by many
such platforms' C
>libraries.
But in our case, the pipes are not as important as the
forks.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: POSIX-isms (was Re: Latest Flex 2.6 code & doc),
john43 <=