[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Tags versus Symbols
From: |
Oviedo Javier-PKJ843 |
Subject: |
RE: Tags versus Symbols |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:29:09 -0400 |
Hello Shigio.
I came across this section in the tutorial. If I used exuberant ctags,
for example, then I could get the tag treatment which I'm currently used
to along with the other features of Global. Is my understanding correct?
4.2 Plug-in parser.
You can write new parser and use as a plug-in parser.
4.2.1 How to plug in a parser.
If so, how would I do this for the windows environment. I have the
latest exuberant ctags executable which I current use for tagging.
If not then how can I modify gtags-parser to accomplish what I
need/want?
Thanks!!
Javier
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:15 AM
> To: Oviedo Javier-PKJ843
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Tags versus Symbols
>
> Hello,
> > simply get a concise list of definitions, not references.
> Why do these
> > structure elements appear in the SYM file instead of TAGS. Is there
> > some configuration parameter I'm missing?
>
> As you said, current GLOBAL put structure members to GSYMS
> instead of GTAGS.
> To change this, at present, you can do nothing but change the parser.
> You can find it in gtags-parser/ directory.
> --
> Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden> - Tama Communications
> Corporation PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6
> 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
>
- RE: Tags versus Symbols,
Oviedo Javier-PKJ843 <=