[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: "Exotic" GNATS 4 fields
From: |
Dirk Bergstrom |
Subject: |
RE: "Exotic" GNATS 4 fields |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:26:13 -0700 |
> "Cases" (I have found no explanation of what it is for)
i've never seen this one. can't imagine what it's good for. maybe it's
similar to Related-PRs, which is a better name anyways.
> "Keywords" (which seem to have little use as long as there
> aren't any tools
> for indexing the GNATS database apart from gen-index which
> doesn't seem to have anything to do with this field)
as a former librarian, i'd argue for keeping this field. as a current
gnats 4.0 administrator, i can't argue quite so strongly -- only about
30% of our PR database has data in the keywords field. however, i think
it would be good to encourage people to use this field...
> "Quarter" (Not exactly sure what this is -- target quarter for a fix?)
i've never understood this one -- i always figured it was a legacy
thing. if it's not a standard field in 3.x, i see no reason to have it
in 4.0.
> "Release-Note"
our developers fill this out for every non-confidential PR, and the
documentation folks use the info to prepare the published release notes.
it's a pretty useful field...
--
Dirk Bergstrom address@hidden
_____________________________________________
Juniper Networks Inc., Computer Geek
Tel: 707.433.0564 Fax: 707.433.0769