[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No HTML mails in Gnus (was: emacs or xemacs?)
From: |
Lute Kamstra |
Subject: |
Re: No HTML mails in Gnus (was: emacs or xemacs?) |
Date: |
10 Sep 2002 23:06:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Alex Schroeder <alex@emacswiki.org> writes:
[...]
> Hm? Maybe you want to read a bit about Gnus -- especially since you
> already use it!
That's one of my tricksies. I let Outlook insert funny User-Agent
headers.
> http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MimeTypesWithGnus
Well, actually I read the Gnus manual once. It's just that only the
things I was interested in at the time really registered. After that,
I just started to learn new things as I encountered them or when I
felt that I needed them. It's a very lazy attitude, I know, but
laziness is supposed to make you do smart things, right?
Anyway, thanks for the pointer (and for maintaining the Wiki).
Lute.
--
(spook) => "Vickie Weaver Janet Reno broadside"
(insert-file-contents "~/.signature") => (error "`~/.signature' too rude")
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Adam, 2002/09/11
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Sacha Chua, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Zhongtao Zhu, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/12