[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET
From: |
Benjamin Lewis |
Subject: |
Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:52:03 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
On 13 Nov 2002, joao@teaser.fr wrote:
> kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes:
>
>> The key has changed recently. It seems your documentation and the
>> code were not in sync.
>>
>> The current key is C-c C-m, it used to be M-m.
>>
>> Is there a hint somewhere in the documentation that you were reading
>> which version of Gnus it applies to?
>
> The gnus-tutorial, in "Getting Started on Unix", says M-x gnus-version
> should say something like v5.8.8.
>
> I got the tutorial off the web (forgot the site, sorry, found it through
> google), accessed the files from CVS, and I'm reading the info files (I
> believe I did a 'makeinfo' or something). This was like a week ago. Hope
> this helps you.
>
> However : the M-m f suits me fine, otherwise I'd have to go back to my
> original question of how to enter the C-m. As I'm typing this, if I try
> C-c C-m, my keyboard beeps. Better still, I try it under C-h k, it says
> "C-c RET" is undefined. See, I *can't* use C-m that way.
>
> So. I don't know what to make of this. Thanks all for helping me.
What does M-x gnus-version RET say?
--
Benjamin Lewis
Amoebit:
Amoeba/rabbit cross; it can multiply and divide at the same time.
- Getting back C-m instead of RET, xxx, 2002/11/11
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Benjamin Lewis, 2002/11/11
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Michael Slass, 2002/11/11
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Benjamin Lewis, 2002/11/11
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, joao, 2002/11/11
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Michael Slass, 2002/11/11
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Kai Großjohann, 2002/11/12
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, joao, 2002/11/13
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET,
Benjamin Lewis <=
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, joao, 2002/11/13
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Benjamin Lewis, 2002/11/13
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Kai Großjohann, 2002/11/14