[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: simple editor required
From: |
kgold |
Subject: |
Re: simple editor required |
Date: |
11 Jun 2003 21:03:05 GMT |
While I'm as emacs-fanatic as anyone here, it's still good to know
some vi. vi comes standard with Unix and emacs sometimes does not.
Some day you'll be at a customer site, and vi will be all they have.
Peter Lee <pete_lee@swbell.net> writes:
>
> Why should the employer care what tool you use to get a particular job
> done with? I mean unless your job is to create vi add-ons (or
> something actually targetting vi) what difference does it make how the
> text is generated? If I ever found myself faced with such a
> brain-dead employer I'd have to move along.
--
Ken Goldman kgold@watson.ibm.com 914-784-7646
- Re: simple editor required, (continued)
- Re: simple editor required, kgold, 2003/06/03
- Re: simple editor required, Jon Kåre Hellan, 2003/06/03
- Re: simple editor required, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/05
- Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/06
- Re: simple editor required, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/06/06
- Re: simple editor required, Harry Putnam, 2003/06/06
- Message not available
- Re: simple editor required, Peter Lee, 2003/06/06
- Re: simple editor required, Harry Putnam, 2003/06/06
- Message not available
- Re: simple editor required, Peter Lee, 2003/06/06
- Re: simple editor required, David Masterson, 2003/06/09
- Re: simple editor required,
kgold <=
- Re: simple editor required, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/06/11
- Message not available
- Re: simple editor required, Benjamin Rutt, 2003/06/11
- Re: simple editor required, Kin Cho, 2003/06/11
- Re: simple editor required, Benjamin Rutt, 2003/06/12
- Re: simple editor required, Kin Cho, 2003/06/12
- Re: simple editor required, Peter Lee, 2003/06/12
- Re: simple editor required, Benjamin Rutt, 2003/06/12
- Re: simple editor required, Galen Boyer, 2003/06/12
- Re: simple editor required, Kin Cho, 2003/06/12
- Message not available
- Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/06