[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs for everything?

From: Pascal Bourguignon
Subject: Re: emacs for everything?
Date: 21 Nov 2004 17:22:21 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

Jay Belanger <address@hidden> writes:

> Pascal Bourguignon <address@hidden> writes:
> > Kai Grossjohann <address@hidden> writes:
> ...
> >> Currently, I use OpenBox.  It's painful, but I can bear it.
> >
> > You should try clumpwm: it's written in Common-Lisp and modifiable
> > on the fly.
> Do you meant StumpWM?


I'm wondering whether AI can ever be reached with neural-networks.
I'd rather bet for strong _symbolic_ AI...

> It's eventually going to be a common lisp successor to ratpoison; not
> as featureful yet, but still pretty cool.

__Pascal Bourguignon__           
The world will now reboot; don't bother saving your artefacts.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]