Re: elisp help needed

[Robert D. Crawford]

RD <rjjd@localnet.com> writes:

> Robert D. Crawford wrote:
>> I have the following lines in my .emacs file: 
>
> (remove-hook 'w3m-after-cursor-move-hook #'w3m-print-this-url) 
>
>and for some
>> reason, to get it to eval I have to do it by hand every time I
>> restart emacs.  I *think* this might be the only code that is not
>> being evaled, but I do not know any way to be certain.  I know that
>> there are things below this line that are being correctly evaled.
>> All the code in the customize section seems to be ok, and I have a
>> function that byte-compiles .el files when they are saved that works.
>> Is there some way to know what is being evaled?  Thanks, rdc
>>
>
> I use the old "print" method.  I salt my .emacs file with (message
> "blah") commands to report progress.

Yeah, I thought about doing this, but it seemed there should be a better
way.  
>
> Is there a command after the remove-hook that puts the hook back?

That is a good question.  I looked at the documentation for the
function and it says: 

w3m-print-this-url is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `w3m'.
(w3m-print-this-url &optional INTERACTIVE-P)

Display the url under point in the echo area and put it into `kill-ring'.

This function is advised.

After-advice `emacspeak':
Produce auditory icon.

The changes that emacspeak makes on the hook come from the file
emacspeak-w3m.el I think.  I guess it could be that the file is not
loaded until after the .emacs file is loaded and w3m is started for the
first time.  I am going to put some message lines in the file to see
when it is loaded.

If it is the case that the file is not loaded until after my .emacs,
what can be done to take care of this, outside of editing the source of
the file itself?  I think that is a very bad idea.

Thanks,

rdc

-- 
:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:
Robert D. Crawford                                      rdc1x@comcast.net

Q:      What do you have when you have a lawyer buried up to his neck in sand?
A:      Not enough sand.
:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|:|: