[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
gnu vs. xemacs
|
From: |
H. |
|
Subject: |
gnu vs. xemacs |
|
Date: |
27 Dec 2006 03:46:21 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
I was just curious why people in this community prefer gnu over xemacs,
or if that is the case, and, whatever your preference is, why you feel
that way. I'm neutral myself, being just a beginner. All opinions
welcome. For instance, perhaps these difference forks are good for
different things...?
- gnu vs. xemacs,
H. <=
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Peter Dyballa, 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Sven Bretfeld, 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Ramprasad, 2006/12/28
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Tim X, 2006/12/28
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Matthew Flaschen, 2006/12/28
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Tim X, 2006/12/28
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Leo, 2006/12/28
- "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), B. Smith-Mannschott, 2006/12/29
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Micha Feigin, 2006/12/29