[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnu vs. xemacs
|
From: |
Ramprasad |
|
Subject: |
Re: gnu vs. xemacs |
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:57:41 +0530 |
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 19:29, Sven Bretfeld wrote:
> years and I was looking for a Linux editor as powerful as WinEdt which
It's GNU/Linux system.
Please read
* http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-users-never-heard-of-gnu.html
* http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html
-
Ramprasad B
- gnu vs. xemacs, H., 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Peter Dyballa, 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Sven Bretfeld, 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs,
Ramprasad <=
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Tim X, 2006/12/28
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Matthew Flaschen, 2006/12/28
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Tim X, 2006/12/28
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Leo, 2006/12/28
- "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), B. Smith-Mannschott, 2006/12/29
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Micha Feigin, 2006/12/29
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Alexey Pustyntsev, 2006/12/29
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/29
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Gian Uberto Lauri, 2006/12/29
- Message not available
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Robert Thorpe, 2006/12/30