[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to redefine Parantheses?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: How to redefine Parantheses? |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:34:10 +0300 |
> From: Ralf Angeli <dev.null@caeruleus.net>
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:50:39 +0200
>
> * Eli Zaretskii (2007-04-10) writes:
>
> >> From: Ralf Angeli <dev.null@caeruleus.net>
> >> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:35:53 +0200
> >>
> >> > Ah, but other things are not really the same, since I don't regard the
> >> > behavior you want as 100% correct.
> >>
> >> Please be more precise. Are you referring to movement commands?
> >
> > That, and the paren-matching features (e.g., show-paren-mode).
>
> We are running round in circles.
Maybe you are; I ain't. You asked me to explain what behavior I like
about the current syntax, and I answered. It is okay to disagree;
there's certainly no need to reiterate why you dislike the current
behavior, because you already stated that.
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Ralf Angeli, 2007/04/09
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/09
- Message not available
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Ralf Angeli, 2007/04/09
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/09
- Message not available
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Ralf Angeli, 2007/04/10
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/10
- Message not available
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Ralf Angeli, 2007/04/10
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Message not available
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Ralf Angeli, 2007/04/11
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/11
Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Peter Dyballa, 2007/04/08
Message not available