Re: EmacsW32 invocation options

[Juanma Barranquero]

On 5/3/07, Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:

> In SW there are always those who prefer not to do rather than do because
> then there is no risk of the apple cart being upset. This attitude can
> pay dividends in the long run. "Half assed" solutions to "partial
> problems" often come and bite one in the ass at a later date. I suspect
> people are worried that W32Emacs might be just such a venture.

And in this case, is not that some people (me included) preferred "not
to do". More like "not now, because it could benefit from some
additional thought".

> So, I for one am grateful for Lennart's work on this issue
> anyway. Is it perfect? No way. Is it better than went before?
> Yes.

Of course.

> Is
> Lennart open to suggestions for improvement from the people who actually
> use it?

That's a good question.

            Juanma