[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what's much better in eshell than eg tcsh?
From: |
Chris McMahan |
Subject: |
Re: what's much better in eshell than eg tcsh? |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Apr 2008 09:13:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (windows-nt) |
The advantage of eshell is in it's automatic inclusion with emacs, and
its portability across platforms.
You also have the advantage of access to emacs functions and lisp
programming.
I wouldn't go so far as to say one is better than the other. Just use
the one that's appropriate for a given situation.
- Chris
dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs) writes:
> I tried it once, a few years ago, and found it difficult,
> maybe even unpleasant, to use. Also never learned how
> to do things I was used to do with tcsh.
>
> And why better (for programming) than bourne?
>
> What I do depends on what you guys say.
>
>
> THANKS
>
> David
>
>
--
(. .)
=ooO=(_)=Ooo=====================================
Chris McMahan | first_initiallastname@one.dot.net
=================================================