[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Checking vc-state recursively under a directory
|
From: |
Nordlöw |
|
Subject: |
Re: Checking vc-state recursively under a directory |
|
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:30:08 -0700 (PDT) |
|
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On 23 Juli, 15:03, Nikolaj Schumacher <address@hidden> wrote:
> Nordlöw <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Is it somehow possible to check whether all the files under a version-
> > controlled directory are all up-to-date (updated)? That is like vc-
> > state() but recursively for a directory?
>
> What do you mean? up-to-date or updated? up-to-date means
> (not (vc-workfile-unchanged-p "file")), while updated means something like
> (file-newer-than-file-p "file.elc" "file.el")
I mean like vc-state but for a whole repository, say vc-dir-state(DIR)
and should be behave something like the following (using CVS as
example):
A function that runs "cvs update" and return, say 'up-to-date, if no
file in repository was changed otherwise say 'patched.
If this function returns 'patched we know that something was changed
and we need to rebuild things...
/Nordlöw