[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 22.2 slower than 21.3
From: |
Robert |
Subject: |
Re: 22.2 slower than 21.3 |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:35:48 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Aug 29, 1:22 pm, Martin Fischer <paroz...@web.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Robert writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just installed 22.2 (pre-built binary for Windows XP), but find it
> > slower than 21.3. I notice when opening C-files. I went straight back
> > to 21.3 now because of that.
>
> How did you measure, that it is slower.
I just noticed when opening a C source file I am working on. Counted
seconds now, see below.
>
> >
> > I have not been following this group regularly, is this a well known
> > issue? Will this get faster in upcoming versions? The problem could
> > perhaps also be that the binary for Windows was built differently.
> > Have others seen the same as me?
>
> No, but you could try the 22.3 pretest binary from
>
> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/windows/emacs-22.2.91-bin-i386...
Thanks for the link, I tried that version and it is virtually
indistinguishable from the 21.3 version.
I tried to count now, and the file opens within one second with 21.3
and 22.2.91. With 22.2 it takes 4 seconds. Even when I kill the buffer
and reopen the file again from dired it takes 4 seconds. I am happy to
see that 22.2.91 is just as fast as 21.3. I won't bother filing any
bug then, I'll just skip the 22.2 version.
Thanks again.
-Robert
>
> and send a bug report if necessary.
>
> Martin