[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wikipedia's (ascii) math notation? emacs easy-way to translate it?
|
From: |
Timothy Murphy |
|
Subject: |
Re: wikipedia's (ascii) math notation? emacs easy-way to translate it? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:38:51 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
KNode/0.99.01 |
Xah Lee wrote:
> Mathematica is a
> order of magnitude better because its typesetting system not only
> passively show math formulas as a pretty printing system, but the
> markup syntax is also semantically meaningful. (for example, when you
> type set x^2/x^3, it actually knows that it is x^(2/3)
Hope this isn't so ...
- Re: wikipedia's (ascii) math notation? emacs easy-way to translate it?, Sven Utcke, 2008/12/01
- Re: wikipedia's (ascii) math notation? emacs easy-way to translate it?, Peter Dyballa, 2008/12/01
- Re: wikipedia's (ascii) math notation? emacs easy-way to translate it?, David Hansen, 2008/12/01
- Inappropriate advocacy [Was: wikipedia's (ascii) math notation? emacs easy-way to translate it?], Alan Mackenzie, 2008/12/02
- Message not available
- Re: Inappropriate advocacy [Was: wikipedia's (ascii) math notation? emacs easy-way to translate it?], Richard Riley, 2008/12/02
- Re: Inappropriate advocacy [Was: wikipedia's (ascii) math notation? emacs easy-way to translate it?], Alan Mackenzie, 2008/12/03
- Re: Inappropriate advocacy [Was: wikipedia's (ascii) math notation? emacs easy-way to translate it?], rustom, 2008/12/03
- Re: Inappropriate advocacy [Was: wikipedia's (ascii) math notation? emacs easy-way to translate it?], Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/03
- Re: wikipedia's (ascii) math notation? emacs easy-way to translate it?, Tariq, 2008/12/04
- Re: wikipedia's (ascii) math notation? emacs easy-way to translate it?, Xah Lee, 2008/12/04