[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: e-blog.el help please
From: |
ken |
Subject: |
Re: e-blog.el help please |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:26:55 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) |
e-blog didn't work for me either. I posted about it months ago, never
got a reply, so just gave up on it.
--
War is a failure of the imagination.
--William Blake
On 08/27/2009 05:58 AM rpd wrote:
> Hi
> I want to use e-blog.el to help post to my google blogger blogspot but it
> doesn't work
> (curl is installed & works - I am running Vista O/S).
>
> Here is the error message when I do M-x e-blog-new-post & after I have put
> in my username & pwd:
>
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil)
> call-process("curl" nil "*e-blog*" nil "--stderr" "/dev/null" "--header"
> nil "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/default/blogs")
> (let (feed) (set-buffer e-blog-buffer) (erase-buffer) (message "Requesting
> list of blogs...") (call-process "curl" nil e-blog-buffer nil "--stderr"
> "/dev/null" "--header" e-blog-auth e-blog-fetch-bloglist-url) (setq feed
> (buffer-substring ... ...)) (message "Requesting list of blogs... Done.")
> feed)
> e-blog-fetch-bloglist()
> (e-blog-parse-xml (e-blog-fetch-bloglist))
> (e-blog-setup-choose-buffer (e-blog-parse-xml (e-blog-fetch-bloglist)))
> e-blog-choose()
> (if (e-blog-check-authinfo) (e-blog-choose))
> e-blog-do-auth()
> (progn (e-blog-do-auth) (e-blog-choose))
> (if e-blog-auth (e-blog-choose) (progn (e-blog-do-auth) (e-blog-choose)))
> e-blog-new-post()
> call-interactively(e-blog-new-post)
> execute-extended-command(nil)
> call-interactively(execute-extended-command)
>
>
> Can anyone help me fix this please?
>
> (I saw this on internet search & tried it but it didn't work:
> ;;e-blog.el Blogger with Emacs in Windows
> ;;http://deepakramani.home.comcast.net/~deepakramani/Blog/2009/07/blogger-with-emacs-in-windows.html
> ;;1.Comment lines that read: "--stderr" "/dev/null"
> ;;2.Beneath the commented lines add the line "--insecure"
> ;;This isn't ideal, since the communication is not secure, but it works fine
> for me.
>
> ;;-Well no-it didn't work for me!so I have switched back! )
>
> Many thanks