[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CPerl and Perl 5.10.x
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: CPerl and Perl 5.10.x |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:10:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Ilya Zakharevich
<nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> wrote:
IZ> On 2009-08-28, Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> wrote:
IZ> The only working version (mine) is under RCS, not CVS.
>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:02:53 -0500 Will Willis <will.willis@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
WW> http://blog.jrock.us/articles/cperl-mode.el%20and%20Moose.pod
WW> This version supports Moose and 5.10
>>
>> Sorry if I'm being dense: is the Emacs cperl-mode.el out of sync with
>> Ilya's version?
IZ> It is "different", and majorly buggy.
So why not update it with your version? Again, sorry if I am missing
the necessary context, but it seems like a good idea.
>> Are Jonathan Rockway's patches being considered?
IZ> There is a certain logistical problem; maybe somebody can help me?
IZ> The way it is done now, one has essentially one set of highlight
IZ> rules. So either highlight of pre-5.10 is wrong, or of 5.10 is wrong.
IZ> Given that (AFAIK) 5.10 is now too buggy to be usable, I hesitate to
IZ> make the change for 5.10-highlight. If there a way to make "flavors"
IZ> of highlights (as in "minor mode" over "major mode") conveniently -
IZ> and without a non-necessary slow-down?
Sorry, I don't know the answer, but I'm in favor of using the 5.10
highlighting if it must be one or the other. I doubt the difference
will matter enough to most users, and those who do will probably prefer
5.10.
Ted
- Re: CPerl and Perl 5.10.x,
Ted Zlatanov <=