[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dired without -l, wdired fails
From: |
Andreas Röhler |
Subject: |
Re: dired without -l, wdired fails |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:42:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>>> Sometimes I like to see just `ls'-output. Would be great if other
>>>> dired-functions work than too.
>>> Plain "ls" output is difficult to parse reliably (though an appropriate
>>> "ls --dired" would be fine, of course, and a Lisp implementation would
>>> work as well). OTOH "ls -1" is OK and should to work just fine with
>>> `dired-virtual'.
>> should I make a bug report for the issue?
>
> I don't see a bug in this thread, but maybe it's because I haven't paid
> enough attention.
>
>
> Stefan
>
When trying edits in wdired-mode, get an error "Text is read-only" in all cases
mentioned above,
while mode-line displays "(Editable Dired...)"
Andreas
- Re: dired without -l, wdired fails, (continued)
- Re: dired without -l, wdired fails, Tim X, 2010/02/17
- Re: dired without -l, wdired fails, Andreas Röhler, 2010/02/18
- Re: dired without -l, wdired fails, Peter Dyballa, 2010/02/18
- Re: dired without -l, wdired fails, Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/18
- Re: dired without -l, wdired fails, Andreas Röhler, 2010/02/19
- Message not available
- Re: dired without -l, wdired fails, Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/16
- Re: dired without -l, wdired fails, Andreas Röhler, 2010/02/16
- Re: dired without -l, wdired fails, Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/16
- Re: dired without -l, wdired fails,
Andreas Röhler <=
- Message not available
- Re: dired without -l, wdired fails, Tim X, 2010/02/17
Re: dired without -l, wdired fails, Tim X, 2010/02/16