[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: c/c++ project management and debugging
From: |
despen |
Subject: |
Re: c/c++ project management and debugging |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:44:59 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Rajinder Yadav <devguy.ca@gmail.com> writes:
> On 10-12-20 08:28 PM, Andrea Crotti wrote:
>> Rajinder Yadav<devguy.ca@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>
>>> yes i already have cedet installed and working, but i would rather not
>>> write makefiles by hand. i understand there is also autoconf that can
>>> be used to generate makefiles, possible that's a better way to go,
>>> still i don't feel like investing the time to learn about autoconf at
>>> this point and time
>>
>> There is also cmake otherwise.
>> The problem is that or
>> - you learn a bit the autoconf skills you need (doesn't take long)
>> and finally write your own build systems
>> - you'll be stuck forever with what other people (microsoft/cedet)
>> thik is a good idea, and normally it isn't
>>
>> Using emacs I think it doesn't make any sense to look for tools that
>> write makefiles for you...
>
>
> Andrea, thanks for your reply!
>
> My reply here is not a direct response to you, but what i feel in
> general (a windows IDE guy in a Linux command line world)
>
> I don't quite understand the rational against emacs + auto makefile
> generation, it kind of hinders progress imho? if someone doesn't like
> the way emacs or netbean does things (for them) with makefiles, they
> always have the choice of doing it by hand, that is the beauty of
> having more choices, so stop taking away my choices if I simply ask or
> enquire for feature y!
I don't quite understand what these comments are about.
I keep seeing references to the cedet project and it certainly
claims to write Makefiles:
http://cedet.sourceforge.net/ede.shtml
Isn't that good enough?
As I said, I don't use code generators and I don't want a
machine generated Makefile. I think hand created Makefiles
are more useful. That's what makes a world.
If you want a machine generated Makefile, go for it.
Tell us how it works (or fails to work).
Saying Emacs can't do something, is a demonstration of
ignorance. The Emacs Lisp engine is a full fledged programming
environment. There is nothing Emacs can't do. There may not be
a package yet that does what you want, but there always could be.
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, (continued)
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/22
- Message not available
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Elena, 2010/12/23
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/12/23
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Andrea Crotti, 2010/12/24
- Message not available
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Richard Riley, 2010/12/24
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/24
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Richard Riley, 2010/12/24
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, rusi, 2010/12/25
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/25
- Message not available
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/21
- Message not available
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging,
despen <=
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Richard Riley, 2010/12/21
- Message not available
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Jason Earl, 2010/12/21
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Elena, 2010/12/21
- Message not available
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Jason Earl, 2010/12/21
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Rajinder Yadav, 2010/12/21
- Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Rajinder Yadav, 2010/12/21
Re: c/c++ project management and debugging, Elena, 2010/12/20