[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Couple of automation questions
From: |
Andreas Röhler |
Subject: |
Re: Couple of automation questions |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:56:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 SUSE/3.1.11 Thunderbird/3.1.11 |
Am 28.07.2011 04:40, schrieb C K Kashyap:
yes maybe, if the tasks repeat and are basically simple. Than you could use
some python or perl too.
no, if it's seldom or tricky.
sed, awk etc. don't have such a thing like edebug for example.
Andreas
Hey Andreas,
You are saying that if the task is not simple then lisp would be a better
way to go right?
That way. These questions are pretty general. Finally every task
deserves it's own choice and consideration.
Many tools are able doing the same or similar things.
Right decision will depend on your experience, knowledge, further
prospects etc.
I'm using all mentioned so far.
If you may select some output with fields, awk always is nice to use for
example.
Well, awk from an shell inside Emacs, sure, which helps editing a lot.
Hey Teemu ... Are you suggesting common lisp because emacs lisp would fall
short in some situations?
Regards,
Kashyap
- Re: Couple of automation questions, (continued)
- Re: Couple of automation questions, Teemu Likonen, 2011/07/27
- Re: Couple of automation questions, C K Kashyap, 2011/07/27
- Re: Couple of automation questions, Teemu Likonen, 2011/07/27
- Re: Couple of automation questions, Memnon Anon, 2011/07/27
- Re: Couple of automation questions, fork, 2011/07/27
- Re: Couple of automation questions, Teemu Likonen, 2011/07/27
- Re: Couple of automation questions, fork, 2011/07/27
- Re: Couple of automation questions, Andreas Röhler, 2011/07/27
- Re: Couple of automation questions, C K Kashyap, 2011/07/27
- Re: Couple of automation questions, Teemu Likonen, 2011/07/28
- Re: Couple of automation questions,
Andreas Röhler <=