[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Numbered regexps throw invalid regex error
From: |
Tom |
Subject: |
Re: Numbered regexps throw invalid regex error |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:30:00 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler <at> easy-emacs.de> writes:
> >
> > There is no mention of an automatic assignment. It says the last one
> > will win, so assigning a number which is already used for
> > a previous group should work.
> >
>
> would consider it a bug then - at least a docu bug
>
I don't think it's a doc bug. The whole point of the feature is that
you can assign constant numbers to groups, so they don't change if you
add/remove parens.
If it can suddenly throw a regexp error, just because you've added
a paren around an other paren then it pretty much defeats the
prupose of the feature.
- Numbered regexps throw invalid regex error, Tom, 2012/01/25
- Re: Numbered regexps throw invalid regex error, Andreas Röhler, 2012/01/25
- Re: Numbered regexps throw invalid regex error, Tom, 2012/01/25
- Re: Numbered regexps throw invalid regex error, Andreas Röhler, 2012/01/25
- Re: Numbered regexps throw invalid regex error, Tom, 2012/01/25
- Re: Numbered regexps throw invalid regex error, Andreas Röhler, 2012/01/25
- Re: Numbered regexps throw invalid regex error,
Tom <=
- Re: Numbered regexps throw invalid regex error, Andreas Röhler, 2012/01/26
- Re: Numbered regexps throw invalid regex error, Tim Landscheidt, 2012/01/26
- Re: Numbered regexps throw invalid regex error, Tom, 2012/01/26