[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE versus emacs
From: |
Tima |
Subject: |
Re: IDE versus emacs |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:58:59 -0700 |
On Oct 5, 2012, at 7:23 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> Emacs has partial support for some of those features, with CEDET always
> shining on the horizon, but instead of catching up with other IDEs as
> time passes, it is falling behind.
The programming feature I miss most in emacs is the code browsing: jump to the
definition of a method, function, class, variable, and jump back to the
original position. I tried to configure CEDET to do this, but have not
succeeded so far.
Before drilling into CEDET, I would like to ask whether I'm looking at the
right direction. What is the recommended tool for the code browsing in emacs?
It should understand the language context, but strictly speaking I do not need
any other features that CEDET provides.
Thank you,
--Tima
- Re: IDE versus emacs, (continued)
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Wally Lepore, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/04
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Suvayu Ali, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Philipp Haselwarter, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs,
Tima <=
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Bob Proulx, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Steinar Bang, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19
- RE: IDE versus emacs, Drew Adams, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Brandon Betances, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/20