[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process inste
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP) |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:11:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:
Hi!
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> ...
>> it's emphasized by Gnus ...
>
> I'm on Gnus, and what I see is: a goofy line "cut here ... start"
> - and, the "highlight": a colored background.
Normally, you wouldn't see the "cut here" lines, just the text with the
colored background, so you probably have configured there.
BTW, it also seems something else is broken with your Gnus. Your
replies don't contain the message id of the article you're replying to
in the References header. E.g., your message I'm just following up to
should contain <87sizfgd3l.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> but doesn't.
>> Would you prefer org-mode blocks that are also font-locked with the
>> language-specific rules by Gnus (and probably other emacs MUAs)?
>
> Yeah, that would be *great*! I've thought of that many times. But - it
> doesn't work? What am I lacking?
What doesn't work? Native font locking? It might be you need to set
this:
(setq org-src-fontify-natively t)
Bye,
Tassilo
- have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, John Leach, 2013/07/08
- Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/09
- Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, John Leach, 2013/07/12
- Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/15
- Message not available
- [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/15
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/16
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/16
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/16
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP),
Tassilo Horn <=
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/19
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/19
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/20
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/20
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/22
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/22
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/23