[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RTF for emacs
From: |
Robert Thorpe |
Subject: |
Re: RTF for emacs |
Date: |
Tue, 27 May 2014 21:52:26 +0100 |
Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:
> But if I had to do those short documents (and couldn't
> use plain text) I would want something that still isn't
> "compiled". I would want to see the changes instantly
> as I make them, otherwise it would be complete torture
> to produce any quantity of such documents. I don't know
> if Org-mode does that, probably.
To be honest I don't care much about WYSIWYG vs compiled. I'll try Org and
Markdown. I'll try LaTeX again if I get the time.
BR,
Robert Thorpe
- Re: RTF for emacs, (continued)
- Re: RTF for emacs,
Robert Thorpe <=
Re: RTF for emacs, Hans BKK, 2014/05/29
- Re: RTF for emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/29
- Re: RTF for emacs, James Freer, 2014/05/29
- Re: RTF for emacs, James Freer, 2014/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Joost Kremers, 2014/05/29
- Re: RTF for emacs, James Freer, 2014/05/29
Re: RTF for emacs, Charles Philip Chan, 2014/05/29
Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/29