[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: confusion with defining keys
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: confusion with defining keys |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:17:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> What you write between [...] does not use the same
> syntax as what's written in "..." (and neither is the
> same as what's written in (kbd "...")).
All of those seem to work:
(global-set-key (kbd "M-RET") 'find-file-at-line) ; 1
(global-set-key "\M-\r" 'find-file-at-line) ; 2
(global-set-key [?\M-\r] 'find-file-at-line) ; 3
But another thing, when you do
(global-set-key [M-RET] 'find-file-at-line)
it says
(error "To bind the key M-RET, use \"\\M-\\r\", not [M-RET]")
- that should indicate "\M-\r", right? (example 2)
So why does the [...] syntax recommend the "..."
syntax, if the "..." is the one outdated/incomplete and
[...] the one modern/universal?
--
underground experts united:
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: confusion with defining keys, (continued)
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/11
- Re: confusion with defining keys, kastian, 2014/06/11
- Message not available
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Emanuel Berg, 2014/06/11
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/11
- Message not available
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Emanuel Berg, 2014/06/11
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Emanuel Berg, 2014/06/11
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/11
- Message not available
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Emanuel Berg, 2014/06/12
- Message not available
- Re: confusion with defining keys,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/12
- Message not available
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Emanuel Berg, 2014/06/12