Re: Always using let*

[Emanuel Berg]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> In some cases, `setq' can't be easily avoided, but
> otherwise, I strongly recommend let* over let+setq.

Absolutely, it totally goes against my instinct to use
let and then setq!

> If it depended on me, I'd swap the two since in most
> cases you could use let*, it's very rare to really
> need `let'.

You mean "let, and not let*?" Because I use let all the
time and I don't think that is uncommon.

-- 
underground experts united