[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs
From: |
Dan Espen |
Subject: |
Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Nov 2014 12:05:00 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:
> Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com> writes:
>
>>> Question: Does anyone know of a package to get that
>>> sweet look?
>>
>> Install debian-el and it will include apt-sources
>> mode.
>
> Here is a screenshot that proves Proulx is right:
>
> http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573/dumps/emacs_nano_debial_el.png
>
> But... doesn't nano still look the best?
If you like the brighter higher contrast colors,
I'd agree Nano looks better.
The colors are easily fixed.
If you don't like 2 lines of your screen being taken up
by a display of shortcuts, Nano looses.
--
Dan Espen
- evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/15
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, saint, 2014/11/17
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Yuri Khan, 2014/11/17
- Message not available
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/17