[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??)
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??) |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:11:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro <oitofelix@gnu.org>
writes:
> Better yet: buy copies from the FSF and donate to
> the nearest library.
You think I'm the CEO of the national bank? *You* buy
them and send them to me, that is the best alternative
yet.
> That way you supports it in developing GNU and
> promoting software freedom, while helping your
> neighbors who prefer a paper book or don't know that
>
> sudo apt-get install emacs24-common-non-dfsg
>
> will solve their problems. Of course, they could be
> afraid of "non-free" repositories or not have the
> wisdom to differentiate what's really free from
> what's not.
It is not really about that in this case. Here it is
more like: Computer Kid Kevin wants to make a 3D
shooter or MMORPG, and he also likes to read the
emails of the girls in his school. So he goes to the
public library to look for books on C++ (perhaps C#
these days), and security. He browses the shelves and
guess what, he finds the Emacs and Gnus manuals! So he
forgets all about fragging people in real-time 3D and
he arrives at the mature conclusion that it is better
to *mail* to the girls (perhaps using Gnus) than to
secretly read their correspondence with other guys.
Happy end. FIN.
> Ps: Debian's craziness goes to the length of
> classifying GNU manuals the same as proprietary
> software, conflating both in the same infamous
> repository. :-( That's another reason for GNU to rule
> the world! ;-)
You know the saying: The Microsoft people are
heartless businessmen, and the Apple people are
stinking intellectuals who cannot do laundry. But
worst of them all are the Linux people - they are our
allies!
[thunderous laughter]
--
underground experts united
- Re: no C-h i m emacs ??, (continued)
- Message not available
- manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??), Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/17
- Re: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??), Bob Proulx, 2014/11/17
- RE: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??), Subhan Michael Tindall, 2014/11/18
- Re: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??), Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro, 2014/11/18
- Message not available
- Re: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??), Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/18
- RE: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??), Subhan Michael Tindall, 2014/11/19
- Re: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??), Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro, 2014/11/18
- Message not available
- Re: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??),
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: manual activism, Dan Espen, 2014/11/18
- Re: manual activism, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/18
- Re: manual activism, Dan Espen, 2014/11/18
- Re: manual activism, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/18
- Re: manual activism, Dan Espen, 2014/11/19
- Re: manual activism, Dan Espen, 2014/11/19
- Re: manual activism, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/26
- Re: manual activism, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/26
- Re: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??), Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro, 2014/11/18
- Message not available
- Re: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??), Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/18