|
From: | Andreas Röhler |
Subject: | Re: Defining functions on the fly |
Date: | Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:40:10 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
Am 17.06.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Stefan Monnier:
Because these functions depend on grammar of the goal-language.Indeed, that's why forward-sexp is supplemented by forward-sexp-function, making it possible for the major mode to provide an implementation that does a more sophisticated sort of parsing than that supported by plain old syntax-tables. Stefan
BTW you may remember a discussion around beginning-of-defun resp. beginning-of-defun-raw. The point was: once a beginning-of-defun-function is set by a language, let it go with it, don't interfere.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |