Re: How to quote a list of functions?

[Emanuel Berg]

"Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com>
writes:

>> This is another example of how much better the old
>> way was when there was no thought whatsoever what
>> anything "is" but instead everything was *used* by
>> their names alone. Well, it is the way of
>> the street.
>
> If you're not happy with the lisp-2-ness of emacs
> lisp, you can always use edwin instead.

Well, happy and happy. If it is lisp-2-ness it is.
I'm in the process of going thru all the code right
now. Personally, I have never felt the need to
separate function from symbol nor do I see anything to
gain from having variables and functions have the same
name. But I will definitely not switch from
Emacs/Elisp to EdWin/Scheme because of that.

-- 
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573