[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `append' vs. `nconc'
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: `append' vs. `nconc' |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Dec 2015 05:00:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
"Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com>
writes:
>> OK, so for example this: (setq
>> completion-ignored-extensions (append
>> completion-ignored-extensions '(".bcf" ".run.xml"))
>> ) Is better as: (nconc completion-ignored-extensions
>> (list ".bcf" ".run.xml")) ?
>
> No. You should never use nconc only for effect (just
> like delete, etc).
What do you mean by "effect"?
The reason I thought it fitting was the definitions of
`append' and `ncons'. Here I want to change
`completion-ignored-extensions'. `append' doesn't
change it, which is why the assignment with `setq' was
there. If it can't be removed (well, in the form of
`setf'), there is still the gain of not creating the
list unnecessarily, which in this case is a matter of
principle but in other cases (with long lists) is
a performance bottleneck?
> Always re-assign the modified list:
>
> (setf completion-ignored-extensions (nconc
> completion-ignored-extensions (list ".bcf"
> ".run.xml")))
>
> otherwise it will break when the place is bound to
> nil. (nil is a symbol and cannot be mutated into
> a cons cell!).
?
What place is bound to nil, when?
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: Error: Setting the shell in sh-mode via a local variable does not work, (continued)
Re: Error: Setting the shell in sh-mode via a local variable does not work, Teemu Likonen, 2015/12/30
- `append' vs. `nconc' (was: Re: Error: Setting the shell in sh-mode via a local variable does not work), Emanuel Berg, 2015/12/30
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Teemu Likonen, 2015/12/30
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Emanuel Berg, 2015/12/30
- Message not available
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/12/30
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc',
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', tomas, 2015/12/31
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Emanuel Berg, 2015/12/31
Message not availableRe: `append' vs. `nconc', Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/12/31
Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Emanuel Berg, 2015/12/30
Message not availableRe: `append' vs. `nconc', Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/12/31
Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Emanuel Berg, 2015/12/31
Re: `append' vs. `nconc', tomas, 2015/12/31
side effects, list sharing [was: `append' vs. `nconc'], Drew Adams, 2015/12/31
Re: side effects, list sharing [was: `append' vs. `nconc'], Emanuel Berg, 2015/12/31
RE: side effects, list sharing [was: `append' vs. `nconc'], Drew Adams, 2015/12/31