help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers]


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers]
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 21:44:16 +0300

> From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
> Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 12:46:43 -0400
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> >> is it (roughly) consensus here to "reply to all" instead of replying
> >> to list?
> >
> > Either one is okay.
> 
> I'm so sure that reply-to-all is correct that I thought it was
> official policy for GNU lists.

You may be right.  I just don't think I've ever seen it written, but
it could be that I missed something.

> I don't understand why people think "recipient might get two copies"
> is worse than "recipient might get no copies". Especially when the
> former issue is trivially avoided by Mailman or MUA duplication suppression.

I fully agree.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]